School District Designation and School Choice: Decision-Making Deadlock

One of the biggest battles in family court, aside from time sharing is school district designation and/or school choice for the child. In Florida, when a parenting plan gives parents joint parental responsibility, one category of major decisions co-parents must make together is educational decisions. Both parents must agree on the child’s school district designation, otherwise the court must decide the designation based on the child’s best interests. School district designation refers to which parent’s address will be defined in the parenting plan as determining the child’s default zoned public school. School choice refers to alternative school enrollment options such as magnet schools, private schools, charters or open enrollment.

Once it is established legally, which parent’s address will be used for school zone designation, if that parent moves to a new neighborhood, the child is not automatically enrolled in the new school district. The previously designated school remains the official designation unless both parents agree to the new school, or the judge approves a change in the designation. Under Florida Statute §61.13, when parents have joint parental responsibility, neither parent can unilaterally change a child’s school and doing so when joint parental responsibility has been legally established can be grounds for contempt.

If parents do not desire to have their child attend the zoned public school, they may want to pursue Controlled Open Enrollment to apply for a school outside of their district. Controlled Open Enrollment required applying in a timely manner to the charter school, specialized program, magnet school or a neighboring district. When parents have joint parental responsibility they are required to both consent to applying to and accepting a school choice transfer.

What happens when the parents cannot agree on the school designation or school choice? The first question is whether the parenting plan already contains a provision for what happens if parents cannot agree on school choice. Some parenting plans have a “tie breaker” clause which would designate one parent with the final decision-making authority to make educational decisions when the co-parents cannot agree. If there is no tie breaker provision in place and the co-parents cannot agree on the school then the court can make the decision on which parent to designate as the ultimate decision maker for education purposes. In making this decision, the court will consider the child’s best interests, the quality of the available schools and proximity to the parent’s homes. One very important distinction to make is that the court considers the best interests of the child; the convenience of the parent is not the court’s primary concern.

Factors the court may consider include the child’s individual learning needs, the preference for keeping children in a school they are already established with and familiar with, which parent can provide a better quality of school, transportation logisitics (such as whether the school is within one or both parent’s zone for school bus transportation or not), and whether the school offers programs tailored to any particular needs of the child (such as an IEP program or IB program). If one parent wants the child to attend their zoned school and the other parent wants to apply for school choice, the analysis is similar, however the court will consider which choice serves the child’s best interests and will consider factors such as commute times, proximity to the time sharing schedule, and quality of the school choice school versus the zoned school.

Lately, more and more parent’s are considering homeschooling as another possible option for school choice. When parent’s cannot agree on whether a child should be home schooled, the court will apply the same analysis, considering the best interests of the child. Homeschooling disputes can be particularly contentious when one parent will serve as the sole educator. A large part of the court’s consideration of the child’s best interests in determining whether ultimate educational decision-making should be awarded to the parent seeking to homeschool, is the quality of the home education. The parent must show that the state’s home education laws have been met and that the education being provided is of sufficient quality.

Co-Parents are strongly encouraged to try to resolve school designation and school choice issues where possible, before seeking court intervention. If you are facing a deadlock in education decision-making with your co-parent, contact Cody Law, to discuss all of the nuances to this issue and explore possible options to resolve the matter.

5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During a Divorce

Tensions can often be high during a divorce. It’s important to tread carefully and be aware of your rights and responsibilities during this difficult time. Speaking with a family law attorney can help you choose the best course of action and avoid these common pitfalls.

1. Sending Disparaging Texts or Emails:

   Hold the phone! Text messages, emails and social media posts can be used against you in Court by your ex, to attack your credibility and character. Your words and actions are a huge factor in the Court's consideration of the best interests of any child or children involved in a Family Law matter.

2. Going Pro Se:

   Understanding your rights and obligations is key. A Family Law attorney will guide you through this process and ensure you reach a fair separation agreement or court settlement.

3. Not Putting the Kids First:

   In all Family Law matters involving minor children, the Court will look to the best interests of the child in making decisions regarding time sharing and parental responsibility. Making decisions based on resentment toward the other parent is never in the best interests of the child and will not work in your favor in the eyes of the court.

4. Moving Out of The Marital Home:

   While you should not stay in the marital home if you fear for your safety, moving out could complicate your claim to an interest in the home. If possible, before moving out of the home you should consult an attorney and ensure there is a parenting schedule in place, where there are children involved, to make sure you have continuing access to the children.

5. Hiding or Depleting Marital Assets:

   In every dissolution of marriage, the parties to the dissolution will make a full financial disclosure. The court will review and determine the marital and non-marital assets. In doing so the court can look at transactions after filing for dissolution and up to two years prior to the filing, for any intentional dissipation, waste, depletion or destruction of marital assets.

   Contact Cody Law to schedule a consultation if you need help navigating divorce or any Florida family law issue.

What Should a Stellar Parenting Plan Include?

Every paternity action or divorce involving minor children in Florida must establish a Parenting Plan. But what exactly is a Parenting Plan and what should a good one include? A parenting plan is a legally binding document that governs all rules that the parties must follow regarding parental responsibility and time-sharing in all child-related matters. Parties can establish a Parenting Plan through agreement (usually following negotiations or a formal mediation), or by presenting evidence at trial, resulting in a court order by the Judge. All terms and conditions in the resulting Parenting Plan must be in the children’s best interests.

Florida Statute §61.13(2)(b) provides a basis for what a court established or a court approved Parenting Plan must contain:

1) a description in adequate detail of how the parents will share and be responsible for the daily tasks associated with the upbringing of the child.

2) a time-sharing schedule that specifies the time the child will spend with each parent.

3) A designation of which parent (or both) will be responsible for healthcare, school-related matters, and other activities.

4) A detailed description of the methods and technologies each parent will use to communicate with the child.

5) The location of exchange of the child for time-sharing purposes.

These provide what, at a minimum, needs to be included for a valid parenting plan, however it’s important to understand that a parenting plan can be as detailed as the parties want to make it. Often times, having a detail oriented plan can avoid future uncertainty and ambiguity and reduce the risk of parties rushing back to court to litigate issues. Parties should keep in mind that as the children grow, the plan should grow with them. Children may not be school aged at the time the Parenting Plan is prepared, but a stellar parenting plan will plan for and address issues ahead of time. Good parenting plans include specification of how the co-parents will communicate with each other, details regarding travel and transportation, choice of activities and payment for extra-curricular activities, which parent’s address will be used for school zone purposes, detailed holiday time-sharing plans (including holidays and events that may be important to your specific family), and a procedure for vacation travel and planning with the children. You should discuss your family’s specific needs with your attorney to establish a Parenting Plan that works the best for you.

Contact Cody Law in St. Augustine Florida if you’d like help navigating a Florida family law issue and designing a parenting plan that addresses the needs of your family.