School District Designation and School Choice: Decision-Making Deadlock

One of the biggest battles in family court, aside from time sharing is school district designation and/or school choice for the child. In Florida, when a parenting plan gives parents joint parental responsibility, one category of major decisions co-parents must make together is educational decisions. Both parents must agree on the child’s school district designation, otherwise the court must decide the designation based on the child’s best interests. School district designation refers to which parent’s address will be defined in the parenting plan as determining the child’s default zoned public school. School choice refers to alternative school enrollment options such as magnet schools, private schools, charters or open enrollment.

Once it is established legally, which parent’s address will be used for school zone designation, if that parent moves to a new neighborhood, the child is not automatically enrolled in the new school district. The previously designated school remains the official designation unless both parents agree to the new school, or the judge approves a change in the designation. Under Florida Statute §61.13, when parents have joint parental responsibility, neither parent can unilaterally change a child’s school and doing so when joint parental responsibility has been legally established can be grounds for contempt.

If parents do not desire to have their child attend the zoned public school, they may want to pursue Controlled Open Enrollment to apply for a school outside of their district. Controlled Open Enrollment required applying in a timely manner to the charter school, specialized program, magnet school or a neighboring district. When parents have joint parental responsibility they are required to both consent to applying to and accepting a school choice transfer.

What happens when the parents cannot agree on the school designation or school choice? The first question is whether the parenting plan already contains a provision for what happens if parents cannot agree on school choice. Some parenting plans have a “tie breaker” clause which would designate one parent with the final decision-making authority to make educational decisions when the co-parents cannot agree. If there is no tie breaker provision in place and the co-parents cannot agree on the school then the court can make the decision on which parent to designate as the ultimate decision maker for education purposes. In making this decision, the court will consider the child’s best interests, the quality of the available schools and proximity to the parent’s homes. One very important distinction to make is that the court considers the best interests of the child; the convenience of the parent is not the court’s primary concern.

Factors the court may consider include the child’s individual learning needs, the preference for keeping children in a school they are already established with and familiar with, which parent can provide a better quality of school, transportation logisitics (such as whether the school is within one or both parent’s zone for school bus transportation or not), and whether the school offers programs tailored to any particular needs of the child (such as an IEP program or IB program). If one parent wants the child to attend their zoned school and the other parent wants to apply for school choice, the analysis is similar, however the court will consider which choice serves the child’s best interests and will consider factors such as commute times, proximity to the time sharing schedule, and quality of the school choice school versus the zoned school.

Lately, more and more parent’s are considering homeschooling as another possible option for school choice. When parent’s cannot agree on whether a child should be home schooled, the court will apply the same analysis, considering the best interests of the child. Homeschooling disputes can be particularly contentious when one parent will serve as the sole educator. A large part of the court’s consideration of the child’s best interests in determining whether ultimate educational decision-making should be awarded to the parent seeking to homeschool, is the quality of the home education. The parent must show that the state’s home education laws have been met and that the education being provided is of sufficient quality.

Co-Parents are strongly encouraged to try to resolve school designation and school choice issues where possible, before seeking court intervention. If you are facing a deadlock in education decision-making with your co-parent, contact Cody Law, to discuss all of the nuances to this issue and explore possible options to resolve the matter.

Divorce and Equitable Distribution of a Corporation

When spouses divorce, marital assets and debts are divided equitably. Typically these marital assets include real property, bank accounts, retirement accounts or personal property. But what happens when spouses own a corporate business? The company and its assets are subject to equitable distribution just like any other type of marital asset under Florida Statutes § 61.075.

The first step is to determine whether the corporation is a marital asset. Absent a prenuptial or post-nuptial agreement stating otherwise the general rule is as follows: If the business was acquired or created during the marriage, then typically it is considered a marital asset subject to equitable division. If the business was acquired or created prior to the marriage date, then typically only the increase in value of the business caused by marital labor or marital funds during the marriage will be subject to equitable division.

Typically the court will determine the company’s fair market value and award the company to one spouse, balancing the division in the equitable distribution of other marital assets. When spouses own interest in the business together, the court will not order them to continue to operate the business post-divorce unless both spouses agree.

Corporation as a Party to the Divorce

A critical consideration to make in a divorce involving a corporation is whether the corporation itself should be joined as a third-party defendant to the dissolution. The decision regarding whether to add a business as a third-party will depend on the type of business entity at issue and the spouse’s claim against the business entity. If a spouse is seeking equitable distribution of property or real property owned by a corporation, then joinder of the corporation is imperative as the family court does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the property rights of non-parties. See Ray v. Ray, 624 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Adding the corporation as a third-party to the divorce allows the court to have jurisdiction over the corporate entity and to issue orders regarding corporate assets. This can enable the court to compel discovery of the company’s financial records and enforce transfer of shares. Bear in mind that a business can be equitably divided without the necessity of adding the corporation as a party, however if the corporation is not added as a party to the action, the family court will not have jurisdiction to order that corporate assets be transferred as part of the equitable distribution. The corporation should be joined as a party in scenarios where both spouses have access to corporate books, checkbooks, bills and when personal expenses are paid by the corporation.

If the decision is made to add a corporation as a third-party defendant in a dissolution, the spouse joining the corporation must ensure proper service of process on the entity and that there is a basis for personal jurisdiction over the entity. If the business is a foreign entity, the Florida long-arm statute must be satisfied.

Joining a corporation as a party may not be necessary when a party is not requesting a claim against the corporate entity or an unequal distribution in any of the corporation’s property. If the corporation is not added as a party, the court still has the power to prevent the disposal of corporate assets or stock to a third party.

Valuation of the Business

If both spouses work for the business, the contribution of their labor, time and skills and the appreciation of the business value during the marriage makes it highly likely that the corporation will be considered a marital asset.

When one spouse holds a smaller percentage of corporate shares or membership units in the business, Florida courts primary focus is still on the marital nature of the asset rather than the legal ownership structure. The amount of units or shares does not automatically dictate how the value of the asset is divided. The spouse owning the majority of the shares or units may however retain the operational control of the business during the divorce process, however the minority owner still has legal rights to prevent the majority owner from hiding assets and to inspect corporate books, tax returns, and financial registries.

A final note regarding valuation of a business in a divorce is that Florida courts must be careful when balancing the business value and awarding alimony. If the corporation’s income is used to calculate the value of the business (which is then divided), that same income stream cannot be fully counted a second time in calculating alimony. A forensic accountant may be required to separate the business’s true asset value from the personal income it generates for each spouse.

If you and your spouse are facing divorce and one or both or you own a business, you should consult with an experienced Florida family law attorney, to determine how best to handle joinder and valuation of a business as a marital asset. Contact Cody Law to discuss this or any other Florida family law needs.

5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During a Divorce

Tensions can often be high during a divorce. It’s important to tread carefully and be aware of your rights and responsibilities during this difficult time. Speaking with a family law attorney can help you choose the best course of action and avoid these common pitfalls.

1. Sending Disparaging Texts or Emails:

   Hold the phone! Text messages, emails and social media posts can be used against you in Court by your ex, to attack your credibility and character. Your words and actions are a huge factor in the Court's consideration of the best interests of any child or children involved in a Family Law matter.

2. Going Pro Se:

   Understanding your rights and obligations is key. A Family Law attorney will guide you through this process and ensure you reach a fair separation agreement or court settlement.

3. Not Putting the Kids First:

   In all Family Law matters involving minor children, the Court will look to the best interests of the child in making decisions regarding time sharing and parental responsibility. Making decisions based on resentment toward the other parent is never in the best interests of the child and will not work in your favor in the eyes of the court.

4. Moving Out of The Marital Home:

   While you should not stay in the marital home if you fear for your safety, moving out could complicate your claim to an interest in the home. If possible, before moving out of the home you should consult an attorney and ensure there is a parenting schedule in place, where there are children involved, to make sure you have continuing access to the children.

5. Hiding or Depleting Marital Assets:

   In every dissolution of marriage, the parties to the dissolution will make a full financial disclosure. The court will review and determine the marital and non-marital assets. In doing so the court can look at transactions after filing for dissolution and up to two years prior to the filing, for any intentional dissipation, waste, depletion or destruction of marital assets.

   Contact Cody Law to schedule a consultation if you need help navigating divorce or any Florida family law issue.

The Unresponsive Spouse: Default in a Dissolution of Marriage

When you initiate a divorce by filing a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage with the court, the initial pleadings must be served on your spose via process server. Timing is crucial when it comes to responding to the petition. In Florida the responding party has 20 days from service to file their response. But what happens when your spouse fails to participate in the divorce? If your spouse fails to respond to your divorce petition, you may be wondering what happens next. At Cody Law, we aim to guide you through each step in the process and keep you informed and educated along the way.

What Happens Now?

The first step, after the 20 day period has elapsed with no response, is to obtain a Clerk’s default. From there, once defaulted, the case will proceed without your spouse’s input. The court will require a final hearing in order to enter the Final Default Judgment. The relief you requested is not automatic, just because your spouse has been defaulted however. The court will not grant any requests that are unreasonable, even without the other party’s participation. Even if your spouse does not participate, you will still need to present evidence to the judge and testimony in support of your requests for relief. Depending on your individual situation, the court will need to determine each of the following issues, without your spouse’s input. :

• Division of Assets and Debts: Under Florida’s equitable rules, marital assets and debts are divided “fairly” although not necessarily equally. If you proposed a division of assets in your petition, the judge may follow your proposal as long as it is reasonable. The judge however has discretion to modify the proposed division if it is unfair or does not meet requirements under the law.

• Alimony: If you requested alimony in your petition, you will need to present evidence to the judge showing that you have a need for alimony and that the other spouse has ability to pay. The court can award alimony without the other spouse’s input so long as sufficient evidence is presented showing that alimony is necessary in your case.

• Parental Responsibility, Timesharing and Child Support: Even in a default situation, where there are minor children involved, the court must determine parental responsibility, timesharing, and child support based upon the best interests of the child. Child support is calculated under the Florida child support guidelines contained under Florida Statute 61.30, using the spouses’ financial information and the amount of overnights awarded to calculate the support amount. You should provide your financial affidavit to the court. If your spouse fails to provide financial information, the court may estimate their income based on available evidence.

  Does Not Responding Mean We Stay Married?

  A common misconception is that if a party just doesn’t respond then the divorce can’t happen. Florida is a no-fault divorce state, which means that the court only requires proof that the marriage is irretrievably broken in order to grant the divorce. As long as all procedural requirements are followed, the judge will enter the divorce, even without the other spouse’s participation.

  Even if your spouse is not participating in your divorce, you still need to present your case to the judge and ensure that your requests align with Florida Law. If you have questions about divorce or obtaining a default divorce in Florida, contact our office to schedule a consultation.

Double Edged Sword: When a Parent Withholds Time-Sharing

Emotions almost always run high during a divorce or other family law action, especially when child custody is involved. Florida has two elements that make up custody: Parental Responsibility and Time-Sharing. Time-sharing means how many overnights each parent has with the minor children. Recent law changes in Florida mean that the court now starts with the presumption that equal time-sharing is in the best interests of the child. In order to overcome the presumption of “fifty-fifty” a parent must show by a preponderance of the evidence that an equal time-sharing plan would not be in the child’s best interest. But what if there is no court ordered time-sharing in place yet? Can one parent unilaterally withhold a child from the other? Can doing so backfire?

When no time-sharing order exists, typically both parents have equal rights to the child and may both spend time with the child, even if the child is living primarily in the marital home with one parent. While this sounds simple in theory, it often leads to complex and messy situations if both parents are not willing to co-parent pending a formal order. Until a formal order is entered, there is no clear benchmark for who makes decisions, when and where children should be on each day, or what to do if parents disagree. This often leads to one parent withholding the child from the other, sometimes out of retaliation, confusion, or fear. In reality, often one parent has been the primary caretaker and day-to-day decision maker and may, by default, end up making unilateral decisions for the children while the case is pending. Courts often view withholding a child from the other parent as problematic and potentially harmful.

In some circumstances, for instance where there are immediate concerns for a child’s safety, temporary withholding might be defensible. However the actions should be followed by prompt formal legal action. If the witholding is simply based on personal conflict or retaliation by a parent it will likely not be excused by the court. Under Florida’s best interest factors, maintaining ongoing contact with both parents is a priority, absent any serious safety concerns, any interference with that could backfire, leading to various consequences, including:

• Court ordered make-up time

• Loss of credibility in future proceedings

• Court-ordered parenting education

• Court ordered therapy

• Denial of shared parental responsibility

• Potential loss of timesharing on a permanent basis by the withholding parent

Withholding time-sharing is a double edged sword and it is recommended you seek the guidance of an attorney before making a decision to unilaterally withhold time. Obtaining a temporary time-sharing order while your case is pending can protect both parents and offer consistency and stability for the child. Once a formal time-sharing order is entered, both parents have the ability to enforce the order should conflict arise.

What Can I do if the Other Parent is Withholding Our Child?

If the other parent is preventing you from time-sharing, there are several protections available under Florida Law, including:

• Enforcement of an existing parenting plan

• Contempt

• Request for make-up time-sharing

• Petition to establish a permanent or temporary time-sharing plan

• Petition to modify

In the meantime it is important to document all missed time-sharing exchanges, text messages, voicemails or e-mails denying time-sharing, all notes on your attempts to exercise time-sharing, and any other relevant potential evidence.

Having the guidance of counsel is important when it comes to child custody. Your attorney can help you get your message across to the judge, present crucial evidence, negotiate on your behalf and prevent mistakes in judgment while awaiting an order. If you are dealing with the other parent withholding time-sharing from you or if you believe withholding may be necessary, it is important to speak with an attorney right away. Contact Cody Law to discuss your individual situation and see if a legal remedy is available to you.